About Me

Name: Gary A McAvin
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick!

 
"Speak softly and carry a big stick, and you will go Far.", the famous quote by President Theodore Roosevelt.

The Big Stick policy is described as:

“Big Stick Diplomacy, a nickname coined by Roosevelt in quoting the old African proverb “Speak softly and carry a big stick, and you will go far,” was the foreign policy that was later called the Roosevelt Corollary. It is an addition to the Monroe Doctrine of 1823. The Roosevelt Corollary stated that the United States had the right to enforce an “international police power” over the Western Hemisphere. It affirmed that other countries did not have the authority to cause unrest in the Western Hemisphere, most specifically in reference to conflicts between Europe and Latin America in the early 1900’s.

Eventually, the phrase “Big Stick” was used in reference to any foreign policy that made negotiations with diplomatic grace, backed by the possible threat of military force.”

(Jennifer Garner, World Politics 116, Vincent Ferraro, Mount Holyoke College)

With this in your face incivility by cowards posing as men, we should be considering President Roosevelt’s approach to dealing with these terrorists. Are we using enough military force in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other terrorist locations? You might say yes; but is the force we are using sufficient? No; we are not generating enough pressure to cause these infidels to yield. Where are Generals like Patton and MacArthur when you need them? These real time men never bowed to pressure while doing their jobs in their assigned command locations. They finished the job.

One of the major disappointments President Bush has suffered; has been the lack of co-operation from the opposing party and the anti-war establishment. President Bush wanted to work with the opposing party and stretched forth his hand in friendship and peace across the isle. But knowing the mentality and personality profiles of these errant failures, I personally thought; that this friendly gesture would be a waste of time. And; I was right. A leopard cannot change its spots, and that party cannot change their worthless ideologue. To me stretching your hand across the isle would be like sticking your hand into an angry Rottweiler’s mouth. He will just chew it off! (According to statistics these dogs are the most often involved in fatal attacks on humans.) Not much difference here, is there?

Should we hold the sword of Damocles over the heads of our enemies? Should we offer peace to these terrorists? Yes we should; but; when they refuse terms of peace and respond with acts of aggression, we should drop that big stick right in their midst. The wicked can never know any peace. And this applies to enemies foreign and domestic. We should rally behind President Bush and the Generals in charge of this anti-terrorist operation until it is finished! Already there are too many Islamists in the USA. And soon we will live to regret this allowance. As it was once said “pay me now, or pay me later” so; what’s it going to be?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Largesse-Excess=Weak People!

 
The loss of Conservatism is now becoming a major concern. Has America shifted their ideals and values away from the conservative way and now predispose their thoughts and lifestyles towards liberalism? The excess that seems available, i.e. money, food, alcohol, drugs, and sex; would lead you to believe that America has become one big place to party. There seems to be no restraint and no stopping point. America is faced with several health problems that can be attributed to excess, and it finds itself in crises mode. The obesity problem now making headlines will drain America’s financial resources in the not too distant future. Who’s going to pay for the health care that will be needed?

Should there be self-control in America? Should food consumption (portion control) regulations be imposed? What about controlling alcohol consumption? Drugs are controlled by the government as they are classified, prescription only or; if they are illegal. OTC drugs can be purchased legally. What I am trying to say here is simply this: If people cannot control their appetite and their drinking habits, something must be done to save them from themselves! Super size meals are offered as standard menu items. These meals now designed for one person in all reality could feed two people. These portions are now glutton size and promoted as big man meals. Consider the chunky soup meals promoted by athletes and their mothers now! Not everyone is the same size as Pro Football players or Sumo Wrestlers, but; they soon will be if this keeps up! And it won’t be muscular bodies either!

The lack of self-control is apparent in the lives of politicians also. They seem to think the taxpayers pockets are a never ending supply of money for their pockets and personal pet projects. The largesse of giving taxpayers money freely to other countries and insipid causes, makes these politicians appear like the Roman Senators did-today! The Romans lost control of everything and rapidly deteriorated into destruction because of it. They indulged in everything to excess! Food was a pleasure! Sex was a pleasure! Drinking to excess was a pleasure. Power was sought after and something to be had at any costs by wicked leadership minded people. The parallels to America are unmistakable, and you can’t count Europe out of the mix either. Most of Europe was under Roman control at one time.

The people of America have been weakened by excessive living. Their bodies are weakened because of improper diet and lack of self-control. Drugs; either legal or illegal have taken their toll also! The conservative lifestyle seems like a thing of the past. How many candidates running for the office of the President of the USA-2008, are values driven, conservative minded, and can also be found with good morals? Consider the field, consider their agenda and consider their overall track record. President Bush was supposed to be a moderate to right thinking individual. But to be honest with you, at times I had a hard time distinguishing him from any other run of the mill liberal.

With largesse, excess and a never ending supply of things to destroy yourself with, we are faced with choices; either bring things under control or perish!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who Are the Democrats Really Working For?

 
Regardless what they say; the haunting question remains. Who are the Democrats really working for; some foreign entity? Right now it doesn’t look like the USA. It appears that everything that is good for the USA meets opposition from the Democratic Party and liberals in general. They are opposed to a good economy! Why? They are opposed to victory in Iraq? Why? They are opposed to drilling for our own oil! Why? No matter what is good for the development and continuation of America; they oppose it! At this time in our history, their allegiance to America should be challenged. And I am serious when I say this!

Would any good American have any problem announcing their loyalties to America? I believe every good and true American loves this country and would tell you so! I am in doubt as to the loyalties of those who continually try to tear apart the infrastructure of America. And this is being done through the legal system. Agenda driven Judges! ACLU fueled lawsuits against everything they just don’t like! What is the basis for this apparent resentment of America?

I believe I know; and have known for a long time their actual party affiliation and loyalties. Their true allegiance is with another time and with rulers/leaders long since dead. I am talking about that old red flag party-the Communist Party! Let Stalin speak! They would hear! Let Lenin speak! They would hear! Let Karl Marx speak-They would bow down! Every action or inaction of theirs is right out of the Communist rulebook for throwing a country into confusion and rebellion! Communist Rules for Revolution presents a set of goals for destroying a country from within! And no; I’m not some conspiracy theorist either! Here are some of the Communist agenda driven goals:

1. Get control of all means of publicity. Get peoples' minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays and other trivialities.

2. Divide people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance.

3. Destroy the peoples' faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and. (speak against, condemnatory utterances)

4. Always preach; true democracy; but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.

Now take a good look at these four points taken from the Communist Rules for Revolution found in a 1919 Military Action. Can you see the Democratic Party in any of these rules? If not; you must be blind! Point one-closing Congress for the BCS game for instance? Point two-constant whining and accusations by Democrat leaders! Point three-always deriding and trying to minimize President Bush, VP Cheney, Secretary of State Rice; and other key central figures of the opposing party! Point four-self explanatory! B&H Clinton is a perfect (bad) example here!

You should really read the entire set of “Communist Rules for Revolution” for even more insight. The following is true and can be verified. This was read into record as described! How long will Americans refuse to see the Democrat Party agenda-Communism? Just Google the following for extended information.

Communist Goals (1963)

Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35

January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals

EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Thursday, January 10, 1963

“Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:

There is more evidence than can be effectively read or presented in any blog or article that only allows brief examples due to space requirements. I believe it is time for all Americans of good will to awaken to the actualities of the Democrat Party; and their real time intents for America and its people! Can we say 21st century slavery here? Total control?

From WND.com: Posted: January 14, 2007 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

"I invoke and summon the constituent power, the people's power, the real fuel, so that the engines I am talking about may lead us to a better future," he said at the swearing-in ceremony where he declared "the new era on the road to socialism."

"Those of you who want to know what type of socialism I have planned for Venezuela should read Marx and Lenin," he said.

Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez—At least he admits it!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrat Rulers-The Kiss of Death?

 
At this moment in time, I don’t know which is worse; Republican losses or; seeing those horrible faces in the news cycle everyday now? Whose faces? Why that old Submarine Captain; Ted Kennedy, Madame Dingbat Nancy Pelosi and that never dying immortal know-it-all Joe Biden, Murtha, et al. This is truly the Rocky Horror show; and it’s downright scary son! Will the ruination of America come at the hands of these incompetents? Isaiah 3:6 …”Be you our ruler, and let this ruin be under your hand.” If some of the old Conservative Blue Dog Democrats were in charge, not to worry mate! Democrats like Zell Miller, John Breaux, et al. And Joe Lieberman is in a class by himself!

This is definitely not your father and mother’s Democratic Party! Although you may not have agreed with everything the old Democrats stood for, at least they worked for the common man at one time. Personally; my people were registered Democrats, but I did not follow their lead, and today I am certainly glad I didn’t! This is beyond anything the Party founders had in mind. You just can’t please all of the people all of the time, and you can’t be all things to all people. Stretching yourself and any political party that far will cause fissures and gaping holes inside the party’s comprehensive ideals and obtainable goals; the demands then become greater than the party’s capabilities.

The Democrats (this past election cycle) ran on nothing and were elected for and on nothing. There is no mandate/s to be found so far. Perhaps they perceive such, but where is the proof of that? The narrow voter margins belay any mandates. Landslides give mandates, remember President Reagan? Remember 1994, so why the change in leadership? That terrible war in Iraq is just taking too long! Oh really! If they would let the soldiers fight this war the way they should; it would be over by now! Remember the “shock and awe” technique that was halted? Remember Hiroshima? Nagasaki? Dresden? And the results were? Surrender by the enemy? Remember? People are looking for a panacea, and the penultimate Messiah like leader! Soon that deceptive person will arise and then…?

I have always found the best leaders are team oriented. They choose the best qualified people as sub-leaders and let them work at their best possible levels; and good positive results are produced. However; on the other side of the coin are obsessed leaders with no one else in mind but themselves! They focus on keeping the spotlight on themselves alone and the rest can; as someone said-“let them eat cake.” Selfish leadership is the harbinger of ruination. It would appear that this current leadership cycle is saturated in the all about me syndrome… This is truly the Kiss of Death!

P.S And incidentally; what is the Democrat plan for the Iraq solution? What would you do?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iraq: Plan B-Fat Man & Little Boy!

 
President Bush’s message on Wednesday evening struck a chord among many. How much longer should the American people wait for any sign of total victory in Iraq? Actually; we have won the war and what remains is clean-up and stabilizing occupation. Remember Japan? Remember Germany? We still have occupation troops in both places, not to mention Korea!

What is the solution for disengagement in Iraq? Should we just withdraw our troops and leave everything to the remaining Iraqis? No; but there should be an ultimatum. Either or! A final date should be established to accomplish everything necessary to sustain total Iraqi control. And then--If the deadline comes and the goals are not met, leave Iraq period. And don’t look back!

Word has reached us (if we are listening?) that our troops just “want to do their job.” What does that entail? It means having the ability to finalize some dissidents. Going into any area in Iraq and completing the mission needs. I am trying to say this:--Many more Iraq’s should be dispatched. It’s time to remove the handcuffs from the fighting Allied forces. Few people remember the cowardice displayed in Viet Nam by those fighting against the US Forces. Women and children were sacrificed as they assumed proximity positions to our men and then blew themselves up. Guerrilla warfare, Geneva rules of engagement? No--Dishonorable warfare and this caused some massacres i.e. My Lai. Our Fighting men were fed up as they are getting to be now in almost the same situations, déjà vu? This same paradigm is being followed by the Iraqi terrorists-cowards!

I believe collateral damage is the by-product of any wars serious application. You must expect this in any war. Japan’s two cities that were bombed by Fat Man and Little Boy were decimated. Germany was also the recipient of devastating bomb runs. Don’t forget what they did to earn that payback! Personally; I’m in favor of bombing these infidels (we can use their same terminology also) back to the Stone Age. Let the survivors rebuild the country (or countries if necessary) with the residual, and let them realize that Islam is not the chosen way. This bleeding heart warfare just doesn’t work with these Islam conditioned people. Besides; it will provide long term Iraqi employment, and this is what some of them are crying for now! Don’t you just love it when a plan comes together?

Most soldiers really want to do good wherever they can. Our soldiers are very compassionate and will extend a helping hand whenever asked. And; America is just like that at its core. We were raised at a higher level than most countries around the world. Just look at the billions of dollars that we have sent abroad during our existence. How many countries are following our pattern? How many countries are willing to join our efforts in eradicating these evil insurgents? Only a few I’m afraid! What a shame; because in unity there is strength.

Plan B should include a pre-emptive strike just to show the enemy that we are very serious about final resolution to this continuing problem. I know it seems a little radical, but I guarantee you this; it will be effective! We may now have to go as far as Fat Man and Little Boy, we can use mini-nukes and precision or pinpoint bombing and achieve the same results. Less is more sometimes! I believe we should have continued the “shock and awe” plan until they quit! However; when you have to deal with political intervention, you already operate with handicaps! The same cry baby mentality existed during Viet Nam! Remember the movie “First Blood” and the point? Rambo/USA will give you a war you won’t believe! Verstehen Sie ?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pigs at the Trough!

 
Headline: Townhall.com

House Democrats and ethics reform:

“The new House Democratic majority has announced its "conversion" on matters of institutional and individual ethics…”

I’ll never run out of writing topics as long as Democrats are in control (oh really?) of the House. Democrats--Ethics reform? Is this a contradiction in terms or what? It seems like smoke and mirrors overall. A cold day in you know where would occur first. If they were really serious about ethics reform (oh that would happen?) there is an itinerary that would prove their sincerity. Difficult to implement, but not impossible, a real House cleaning, followed by a serious Senate sweep. This would of course mean the removal of various ethics violators from both places. Irregardless of Party affiliations!

I believe the lines between entitlements and ethics violations have become obscured. The not so hidden message signaled by constant violations, is that these violators really believe they are entitled to the spoils of being elected to public office. Perhaps a lesson and refresher concerning ethics is needed here!

Ethics

Encyclopedia of Political Information. Ethics is the general term for attempts to state or determine what is good, both for the individual and for the society as a whole. It is often termed the science of morality.

Divisions of Ethics

In analytic philosophy, ethics is traditionally divided into three fields: Metaethics, Normative ethics and applied ethics.

We will refresh ourselves on normative ethics for application’s sake.

Normative Ethics

Normative ethics bridges the gap between metaethics and applied ethics. It is the attempt to arrive at practical moral standards that tell us right from wrong, and how to live moral lives.

  • One branch of normative ethics is theory of conduct; this is the study of right and wrong, of obligation and permissions, of duty, of what is above and beyond the call of duty, and of what is so wrong as to be evil. Theories of conduct propose standards of morality, or moral codes or rules. For example, the following would be the sort of rules that a theory of conduct would discuss (though different theories will differ on the merit of each of these particular rules): "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"; "The right action is the action that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number"; "Stealing is wrong."

Pigs in their natural surroundings have no scruples, ethics, cares, or concerns with anyone or anything but themselves. They are only concerned about where their next meal is coming from. They have no morals as they only seek to satisfy their carnal lusts and needs. Can you see the parallel to those elected officials that feel “entitled” to graze, devour, play, and reject the morality of ethics? And all of these takers are operating on the public’s expense account—Taxes!

I agree; there should be ethics reform but; who should the reformers be? Corrupted officials? Corrupted House and Senate representatives? The fox is in the henhouse here, and no good will come from it, only more devouring and vitiation.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I’m Gonna Get You Sucka!

 
HEADLINE: Newsmax.com

Hillary Plotting to Derail Obama Plans

“Hillary Clinton regards fellow Senator Barack Obama as her biggest obstacle to the Democratic nomination for president in 2008, and is already mapping out strategy to derail an Obama campaign.

Clinton believes enthusiasm for an Obama run would diminish as voters get the message about his lack of experience in government and foreign affairs.”

How pathetic can she be? The program of enemy (real or perceived) elimination continues with this recalcitrant individual. This witch with a B continues with her body count to the top agenda. What is she going to do to Obama? Maybe she will Fosterize him? If someone becomes an obstacle or excess baggage, she simply hits the delete button, arrangements are made, and a terrible accident JUST HAPPENS? Oh Please!

Will somebody slap the stupid out of anyone wanting her for President? Is this how it works, Black Widow spider your way to the top of the heap? Leaving behind mass ruination in your wake?--Pun Intended! I seriously hope for a truth revelation concerning this Evil Woman? Stay at home mom bake chocolate brownies image? Can we say Ma Barker image would be a lot closer here? Obama! You left the plantation and you’re going to pay for this!

I do not have a problem with any GOOD woman occupying the office of President of the USA! I am in no way misogynistic in beliefs. Someone like Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice piques my interest. Color has nothing to do with being a qualifier in this arena, only ability! She must be one of the most intelligent women on this planet, and I certainly respect that defining quality in her!

On the other hand; Hillary is only low rent and Arkansas friendly. I believe she reached her zenith when she lived there. Oh you might say—she’s the Senator from New York now! And I’ll respond with—what do they know? Their major newspaper is the New York Times; and that dear friend says it all! Not to mention allowing that carpet bagging Clinton duo to move in and take over. This gives them the DUH award; hands down!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rules For Radicals: Bill & Hillary’s Playbook!

 
Where do they get those ideas you may wonder sometimes. Many college campuses are rife with activist teachers introducing radical revolutionary ideas! Revolution against what, the system, the government, society in general! No; the revolution for incorporating a socialistic system. Remember Lenin, Stalin, and Marx? These leaders and their radical ideals never seem to die. And incidentally; these were all promulgators of failed governmental systems. Forced compliance accompanied their doctrine of governance. Disobey? Off to the Gulags for you!

We are really facing a dilemma, on one hand radical Islamists, on the other, radical leftists--can we say Socialists here? Both of these are forced agendas. The Islamist wants you to convert to Islam or die, while the Socialists would like to kill any freedoms you might enjoy. They want class enslavement, room only for the two class system, the workers or the proles, and the elites or leaders. The proles did not have the intellectual power to understand that they are exploited by the Party (as a source of cheap labor) and were unable and/or unwilling to organize resistance. Their functions were simple: work and breed. And no complaining or they take things away from you, or elevate the price of commodities until you get the picture—Control—Theirs!

Now there’s a plan? One of the many mentors (can we insert mental here?) that paved the crooked pathway of Bill & Hillary Clinton, was Saul D Alinsky. Alinsky produced a rulebook and a system of revolutionary ideas concerning rebellion against the system. The book titled, Rules For Radicals, formatted a plan for radicals to upset governments that are opposed to their ideals. Their plans could be considered an anarchist’s cookbook for lazy rebellious people who never grew up and accepted their responsibilities in life. Hillary was more than intrigued by Alinsky’s doctrine and writings. She has followed this playbook/cookbook since she came into contact with Alinsky and others idealistically aligned. She then left the reservation; proverbially speaking of course. She was once a Republican! Can you believe it? What changed her? A little thing called college, a hotbed of liberalism and socialistic ideals being taught by radical professors.

Alinsky acknowledges the original source of all rebellion as follows:

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to, know where mythology leaves off and history begins—or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom-Lucifer.”

SAUL ALINSKY

With Lucifer as the example cited for the original source of rebellion, you should be alarmed at Akinsky’s choice of inspiration, but he is only following other leaders of darkness. When you read books like, Brotherhood of Darkness, you will see the source of the Brotherhood’s power, Satan. (Darkness was not just used as a filler word here for the title.) Like Lucifer many only want/desire their own kingdom, no matter what the cost or who they have to kill! How many bodies now Bill? Hillary?

Bill & Hillary are definitely children of darkness. Their true mentor i.e. Alinsky and others who pursue total power is; Lucifer. So in effect when you vote for the likes of the Clinton’s et al, you are desirous of Lucifer’s ruler ship over you!

It makes me wonder at times; are these Presidential candidates so elevated in their own mind, that reason and commons sense no longer applies? What makes these people think they can rule the world, or even part of it? So many potential leaders, (posers?-quasi?) really believe they are the gift to the world. Study the historical record of earth’s many rulers, examine those that ruled various countries and kingdoms, were they really a gift to the people they ruled over, a gift that keeps on giving, like--misery, poverty, oppression, slavery, imprisonment? A vote for Hillary and her ilk is a vote for all of these!

More on this subject, comments invited?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Grateful Dead: Symbolic--Or a Sign?

 
Looking her Glamour Shots best, Pelosi proclaiming that she is the most powerful woman in America, the Democratic Party now takes over. Did she clear that powerful woman statement with Hillary? Anyway; one of the entertainment acts (let the party begin) was the surviving members of the Grateful Dead. How fitting I thought, have the Dead celebrate with the living dead Democratic Party. Was this symbolic? Or was this a sign, i.e. a true reality check?

It was apparent that Madam Dingbat was more than ecstatic. I hope she was wearing her depends; this kind of excitement causes embarrassing accidents, especially to someone of her age. And welcoming those Congressman whose escapades were actually criminal, that really must have been hard? No, not at all, for if she was angered at their criminal behavior she would have refused to even shake their hand. Power does strange things to people, especially those fossils whose resurrection from the dead is nothing short of miraculous. Are the dead grateful? Remains to be seen!

You can smell “High Noon” coming as Pelosi assumes power in the House! She will try and augment her dingbat ideas only to be met by ancient people and ancient ways, the original Grateful Dead; i.e. those House fossils of the Democratic Party. These antiquated remnants from the Ice Age or beyond, will offer her resistance on any ideas she might have, gaining their help will certainly challenge her leadership abilities. Can’t we all just get along? This will be a pissing contest beyond your wildest dreams. You already know that Jane Harman is really mad for being passed over for a chair position she really deserves! This will hopefully cause some serious infighting, and this will be good for America. As long as you can keep them away from doing any harm on issues like more taxation, the better it will be for all concerned. Power struggles always keep some people focused elsewhere, like their own personal territory. The territorial marking process has officially begun!

This is going to be a hoot! We bloggers will have more material than we can write about. There will be some hilarious material available to tide us over until America comes to its senses once again. Maybe by the then GOP will actually listen and figure out what really happened? Don’t hold your breath though!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Crime Pays: If You’re a Democrat!

 
Exposure of officials within the Democratic Party actually getting caught recently with their hand in the cookie jar shows; that crime actually pays--for some! Some people are just drop-dead-stupid! They keep voting these dishonest people back into office! Caught with $90,000 bribe money in his freezer, Louisiana Democratic Congressman William Jefferson was recently re-elected! Criminal activity must be some kind of prerequisite for elected office if you live in Louisiana? What are they thinking, something in that gumbo down there? Instead of ending up in a court of law as a criminal; Jefferson was given his Congressman position back!

Now John Conyers is cleared of ethics violations?

“The Republican-led House ethics committee -- in possibly its last action before Democrats take over Congress -- closed the three-year investigation of Rep. John Conyers Jr. after he agreed to stop using staffers for campaign work and personal errands.
Mr. Conyers, a Michigan Democrat, acknowledged a "lack of clarity" in his dealing with the taxpayer-financed staffers, who reportedly worked on political campaigns and performed other nonofficial jobs, including baby-sitting Mr. Conyers' children and tutoring his wife.” (Washington Times Story)

Do you remember when you were disobedient in school? The teacher (usually a female) called you to come up front of the class? Then she told you to put forth yours hands and turn them over, palms up? And then she proceeded to take out her ruler and slap those hands? Remember? Boy; did that ever sting for awhile. It would appear that Conyers’ punishment was along those same lines. And this clown will probably end up in some high position on a committee after this? Can we say-House Judiciary Committee?

And of course; there is stuff those classified documents into your socks, and leave. The following story explains what actually happened:

“President Bill Clinton signed a letter authorizing former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger's access to classified documents that later came up missing, according to a newly released investigation report by the National Archives and Records Administration. By Chelsea Schilling (© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com)

Next is Rep. Alan Mollohan who is accused of, among many things, funneling $250 million to non-profit organizations that he set up. Mollohan is now the subject of a federal investigation.

What about Obama’s confession concerning cocaine usage?

Long before the national media spotlight began to shine on every twist and turn of his life’s journey, Barack Obama had this to say about himself: “Junkie, Pothead.” That’s where I’d been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man. . . . I got high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind.”

The Democratic senator from Illinois and likely presidential candidate offered the confession in a memoir written 11 years ago, not long after he graduated from law school and well before he contemplated life on the national stage.….

Through his book, Obama has become the first potential presidential contender to admit trying cocaine.

Ok! Trying cocaine? What’s wrong with this picture? Confessing to the use of a controlled substance? Criminal offence isn’t it? Crime once again pays…

Bill Clinton’s candid admission to trying--pot! Truth be told; Clinton was a head. He was known as a human coke vacuum (his nose that is) at parties where plates of this controlled substance (cocaine) was on platters for party goers. What about that bloody trail of dead bodies on their (B&H) rise to fame? Once again crime pays for those above the law criminals.

Just a thought here! What if Osama gets too close to the Democratic Party nod for Presidential candidate, will Hillary make him a Foster child? You know what I mean?

Bottom-Line? Crime pays if you belong to a certain party, or some other dark organization. You are going to see a whole lot more of this very shortly! Crime pays and they know it!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Infiltration & Dilution! Part 2

 
Last time we discussed the process of dilution, (breaking something down or diluting it into manageable parts) we considered by analogy the breaking down of a once strong substance, i.e. the Bible, the GOP, this country’s founding documents and principles. But; what has really happened during the course of time? Changes have been implemented that changed America’s original course and once solid vision.

The founding fathers wanted to see America free from tyrannical rulers and despotic governments. They had good vision while setting up the necessary structure of this new country. Many new inhabitants actually thought they were being delivered to the Promised Land as described in the Bible! Free from oppressive regimes! Free to practice and follow their personal beliefs! This new land offered opportunities they were denied in their previous country of origin. However; along with these visionaries came evil opportunists, who only wanted to cash in on Americas many blessings!

You learn over time that not everyone wants a system of laws keeping things in check. This is usually most applicable to criminal minded people. The lawless are happy with a no law doctrine. They want nothing to govern them they only want to be a law unto themselves. Can any nation-society survive if it becomes totally anarchical? Man has proven the pitfalls of self governance-failure! The human race needs an ordered system of things to keep us all in balance. Consider chaos as the order of the day? Do what you want and when you want. Feel like driving faster than the speed limit, go ahead! Want to run someone over because they are in your way, go ahead, what’s to stop you? Under this non-governance system, should it ever be implemented, man has absolutely no controls. It would seem to be headed that way under a certain party’s direction and leadership.

Back to dilution! When the GOP Party appeared to be headed in a strong correct direction, some felt this agenda had to be derailed. How would you derail a moving locomotive, by setting the tracks to take the locomotive in another direction? This of course would be hidden from public view if possible. “For vain is the trap set in the sight of any bird.” What would be the diluter? Moderates! Infiltrate the Republican Party with Moderates and get this party to the middle of the road. Not right, not left, but a so-called balanced middle-of-the-road approach to everything! And that is how it started!

The GOP was against abortions! The moderates wanted this hard policy and platform reduced/diluted to say except? Except where the mother’s life is in danger! Except where rape and incest take place! The dripping process begins-a political implementation of the infamous Chinese water torture, (no offence towards the Chinese people intended). The dilution of the Republican Party effectively weakened this platform along with many others. The homosexuals were to be accepted as genetically altered born with it re-labeling. Don’t ask don’t tell policy? More dilution! This dilution with the infiltration and implementation of moderates into the GOP was very effective, to say the least!

By now, you get the point of this infiltration and dilution process. It works in every environment. Consider water dripping on a solid rock. Over time the water drops will indent that rock. Even longer periods of dripping will eventually cause that rock to deteriorate away, like the GOP Party. What a shame, and no one is really listening, are they? The GOP Needs to expunge the moderates from within its ranks and move back to the position that *President Reagan among others established it. Wake up GOP and remove that fluctuating moderate platform and stabilize yourselves! Was that “Contract with America” only a periodical joke, intended to last a few years, ride the wave, make that money, sell those books, and then ride off into obscurity? It figures! As they say-“Follow the Money!”

*Now, perhaps you might say that President Reagan was once a Democrat? Yes, he was a Democrat at one time, but he saw the light and converted himself! He was quoted on at least one occasion as saying "I didn't leave the Democratic Party; my party left me". Viola’ and thankfully the rest is history!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Spiteful P in Extreme PMS Mode!

 
Pelosi Set to Attack Conservatives

Just when you thought she was post menopausal and through the change of life, surprise! She exhibits a serious case of PMS, and this directed towards the Republican Party! In some places of this world women are actually legally insane during their monthly cycle? I believe this should be considered with incoming Speaker of the House, Madam Dingbat Pelosi! Good grief Pelosi, what’s the point, payback? You of all people should be an example to the Democratic Party so as to remain in power during future elections! I wanted to use the B word in the title but instead I chose the P. Why? Maybe I would be flagged for using this descriptive term, and perhaps asked to leave the blogosphere! We can’t have that as I still have a lot to say!

Personally, the Democratic Party is without good representation and totally absent of good leadership with fossils like Pelosi, Schumer, Kennedy, Biden, Waxman, Conyers, et al. When you consider some of the stalwarts of previous generations, the Democrats have fallen and they can’t get up! The Democratic Party reminds me of the Senators of Rome prior to its downfall and ultimate destruction! This is where America is also headed under the leadership (quasi) of the Democratic Party!

After the in-your-face celebration of the new (really?) power brokers in DC, the emasculation of the Republican Party officially begins. Would somebody please help us all? After all; what pray tell, is the purpose of government anyway? Setting up the “getting even committees”? Playing gotcha now? Or; you’ll pay for impeaching Bill Clinton? Get over your bad selves; and get on with the peoples business. You were not sent to Washington, DC to play get even parlor games! Not only should Bill Clinton have been impeached, but he should have faced criminal charges for perjury among other things.

Has the leadership in America become of ship of fools? Where is the voice of reason to be found? Maybe some of these young Republicans and Democrats will get tired of the vindictive business as usual agenda driven by Pelosi and her ilk? One can only hope. Personally; I become angry whenever I see her face in any news media! How could something like this happen? Is this the best that America has to offer among the female gender? Why can’t the Democrats come up with someone better and more qualified than Pelosi? (Don’t even insert Hillary here!) If that’s their best choice, we are doomed! Contact the funeral home of your choice and make your personal arrangements because; she will bury us all!!! All the while maintaining her PMS mode/persona! Truly, she’s a Granny with an attitude-Albeit evil!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Infiltration & Dilution! Part 1

 
How would you change something that was or is considered strong; into a weaker more manageable controlled substance? Using the analogy of chemical dilution; you will find that chemicals for the most part cannot be used in their full strength. They must be diluted or watered down, if water is the solvent being used as the diluting agent. The same dilution process can be applied to almost anything. Ever hear of watering down a bottle of whiskey to realize more profit than selling it uncut?

Religion; as most know it has been diluted-watered down from its original strengths. The Bible teaches obedience to the Heavenly Creator and enforces good lawful relationships between human beings. When these concepts are violated by dilutions, they weaken the human condition, and the earth also suffers by those disregarding the ecosystem. Man was supposed to care for their environment!

Now let me focus on purpose of this blog. The two party system of government comprises the governance of America. (Well; except for those behind the scenes hidden string pullers, can we say dark conspiracy here?) These two parties are almost diametric in beliefs, or so it would appear. One party believes in saving lives and presents itself as Pro-Life. The other party could really care less and presents itself as Pro-Choice. They also differ in the stronger laws this country was established on. The Republican Party leans towards the stricter interpretation of America’s documentation, while the Democratic Party wants these same documents to always be in a state of flux, i.e. changeable.

How can America’s constituency be satisfied with these diverse views? America has become weaker in values and morality since its founding. Why? Because America is being gradually removed from the strengths it once knew. How? By dilution! By weakening the belief system, starting with the Bible and then working through the legal structure, America has lost its original power. Let’s see an example of how this takes place.

During the rising up and regeneration of the Republican Party, oppositionists planned to infiltrate the Republican Party and change its platform. The Republican Party under the newly elected president, Ronald Reagan wanted to return to the original platform that it was established upon. Republicans were at one time staunch supporters of life, religious, totally anti-abortion, Pro-Life in values and concepts! Recognizing the power the Republicans now possessed under President Reagan, people of lesser character values set out to change the Republicans viewpoint on these moral values. How? By infiltration!

And by infiltrating the Republican Party…

More next time…

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Five Second Love Affairs!

 
With the “new” report on pre-marital sex, the news media would have you believe that everyone does IT! Not necessarily true! However; this fast paced want it now generation cannot seem to stabilize. They are always looking for the next big thing, and moving on very quickly in their relationships with the opposite sex. “Hooking-up” is only for the pleasure of the moment. When this brief encounter is over, it’s on to the next relationship. No wonder the love as generations past knew it; has now become cold ineffectual and meaningless. However; the accuracy of this report should be questioned!

Parental guidance can be the psychological imprint the children follow. If the parents are cold and unresponsive in their relationship towards one another, the children will mimic this pattern. All parents must show love and genuine affection for each other. The children see this good healthy relationship and will remember it, and hopefully copy it in their own marriage.

Marriage between one man and one woman are discouraged by the phenomenal divorce rate in America. Over 50% are doomed from the start. Why do you suppose that is? Children without proper parental guidance and examples have nowhere to turn, or anyone they can look up to, if their parents fail them in teaching stability in relationships. Now it would seem that love affairs only last for a brief duration of time. The couple meet, jump into a sexual tryst, and them move on to the next one very rapidly. When asked by one of the paramours about their relationship or love affair, they causally respond with, “oh! That was yesterday or last week, or I have already moved on! Get over it!

When the world was a more innocent place to dwell, and when sex was not being pushed and presented as the only thing the world needs to focus on, relationships endured. When a boy or girl met, it was usually in school or church. They met while attending one of these institutions and developed a friendship for several years prior to actually dating. Then this relationship gradually moved towards making it permanent through marriage. Thus the old response to who did you marry question becomes, “I married my childhood sweetheart.” Those marriages usually lasted a lifetime.

Today’s obsession with sex and high-speed relationships has definitely wreaked havoc on this generation’s stability. With the number of unmarried mothers at an all time high, where is any responsibility for these uncontrolled actions seen or taken? When a young girl becomes pregnant the responsible party should be forced to take responsibility. If the responsible party is negligent in their duties, society then pays for everything through the taxpayer funded organizations, i.e. welfare! Should we as a society pay for other people’s misdeeds and sins? If we were the contributing factor, I’d say yes, but; many of us do not in any way contribute to these children’s delinquency!

We certainly need good parental examples for future generations. The open explicit attitude to quick relationships and sex galore needs to be stopped. If responsibility can be taught and enforced, these children have a chance to be productive giving people. Tomorrow’s generations really have nothing to look forward to if promiscuity continues and escalates.

Personally; I would question the validity of this so-called pre-marital sexual activity report. I seriously do not believe the results. They would have you believe that everyone (well almost everyone) is participating in sex prior to marriage! Do you remember the Kinsey Report? They would have you believe that everyone masturbates and are nothing but sexual perverts at heart! The real truth came out later that the generators and participators of the Kinsey Report were sexual deviates themselves. So don’t believe everything you hear or read concerning these so-called sex reports!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Chameleon Starring in: Whatever it Takes!

 
Well; the games have begun! Sort of! Out of the starting blocks first, (or maybe first this year) is Osama, followed closely behind by that stay at home Mom, Hillary. Or is it that-I Believe-Evangelical epiphanic woman of virtue, the new Hillary? Will it be a complete transformation or will it be a media transfiguration…so-to-speak? One thing you can be sure of; it will be the semblance of what her research team determines she should portray. And; whatever it takes to fool the people into voting for her, will be her temporary guise.

The voters have proven themselves to be very malleable over the years. Candidates can play on the voters mental weaknesses and be victorious. How many voters take the time to research the candidate they are going to vote for? How many voters really know where each candidate stands on the issues? How many voters actually know that many of these candidates are nothing more than snake oil salesmen/saleswomen? And? They will say anything, do anything, and become anyone, just to get elected. Once elected, surprise, surprise! Who knew Bill Clinton’s deviant behavior would lead him to disgracing the office of the President of the United States of America-And this for the whole world to see?

So you really think that Hillary is the type that stays at home and bakes chocolate cookies? Do you really think that Hillary is a modern day Madonna? Whoa! You had better get the smelling salts because you really need to clear your head if you believe that! Hillary will chameleonize her presentation in any way shape or form, (puns intended) to become President of the USA! When her makeover team is done, she will be known as Saint Hillary! She will be able to walk on water! She will be the wisest woman who ever lived! She will have the answers to all of the world’s problems! Wow! What a woman! Not!

The ugly truth of the matter is this! You can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig! No matter what the makeover team presents as the possible next woman President; she is still ugly inside. That same old evil Hillary will be latent within waiting to spring forth when she is in power. Some people should never rise above their incapacities, and Hillary R. Clinton is one of those people. She has already ascended above the limitations of the Peter Principle! Just say no if she is on the ballot, or you will be sorry!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive