This is going to be a tough time on those of us that were raised respectfully and with respect. It seems that Washington, DC has become victimized by less than sane low rent individuals. One in particular comes to mind, James Webb, as in tangled web. The disrespect that he showed towards a sitting President reveals this low life for what he truly is; low! He claims that President Bush is mismanaging the war in Iraq. Like he could do a better job? It always seems the lame minded Monday morning quarterbacks could do a better job; really? And all you have to do is query them on how they would handle the war in Iraq to find how brain dead they really are!

What caused this misfit to react with such vehemence? All President Bush inquired of him was the welfare of his son in Iraq! What’s this? I’m sorry; should I show this Webb person respect? Not really! We were also taught that respect is earned by good character, good actions, and beyond reproach conduct. Webb has exhibited neither. This disrespectful action really rankled me; because I also have a son serving in Iraq as we speak. His company has been in harms way on numerous occasions. So; is this Bush’s fault? No; this is radical Islam’s fault, and Webb needs to understand this! I can’t help but think what goes around comes around. And; he has something coming his way for sure. My thoughts turned towards the possibility of his son coming home in a body bag; then what would he do? Kill the President?

Actions speak louder than words as they say. We caught a real time glimpse of this being fulfilled during President Bush’s State of the Union Address! Body language is hard to miss, and it really told a story that night. And the Dumbocrats chose Webb to respond to President Bush’s address. New Pit Bull this one? But let’s read what one of my favorite columnists has to say on Webb. Ben Shapiro writes this:

“But Webb's most disreputable attack was his implication that President Bush cared less about the blood of our military men and women than Webb. Webb went out of his way to champion his military service, his father's military service, his brother's military service and his son's military service, all of which was perfectly normal and commendable. Then Webb crossed the line: "We owed [the national leaders] our loyalty, as Americans, and we gave it. But they owed us sound judgment, clear thinking, concern for our welfare, a guarantee that the threat to our country was equal to the price we might be called upon to pay in defending it."

"Concern for our welfare." This is obscene. The idea that President Bush wrote off the lives of military men and women on a whim is an egregious slur. It is a direct slap at Bush's honor and a vile attempt to drag Bush's character through the mud.”

As he echoes my sentiments exactly, I will discontinue expressing my disrespect for this Democrat outcast. No man of honor that has served this country should ever show a sitting President disrespect; unless of course it’s Bill Clinton! Maybe they are two of a kind, something is wrong here!

 

What happened? How did the Republican Party end up on the outside looking in? Well; can we say stupid? Can we say arrogance? Can we say forgotten ideology? The list is almost endless. Corruption played a major factor in their defeat. For Pete’s sake get back to the right side of center and stay there! You cannot compromise and accept abortion; you can’t accept homosexuality as Republican policy and cater to the lobbyists who push this agenda. Can you accept same sex marriage? Because the Republicans have compromised their positions on several key issues, have they been driven back into the wilderness for another 40 years? Slow learners here if they are!

So what has transpired that the wilderness condition is now upon the Republican Party? They have lost their compass, their vision, and their ideology. The party that should be representing the USA majority’s true beliefs has failed their constituency. Conservative America is fed up with their continual shift away from conservative ways and thoughts. So they sent you a message! Did you get it? Personally; I will no longer offer financial assistance to the Republican Party until they return to the party’s true core concepts. This past election cycle, I supported Senator Santorum in a losing cause. I was (and still am) offended that more support for this fine Senator was not offered by the Republican Party. The Democrat that won couldn’t carry Senator Santorum’s lunch pail. Pathetic replacement that one!

This wandering party only needs to seek previous winners and their winning philosophies. Such a one can be found in President Ronald Reagan. If this apostate party really wants to keep at least the office of the President, this is where you must go. And while you are seeking sources of wisdom and reclamation; the Bible would help many of those poor floundering souls that think homosexuality just happens, or those congressional pages are fair game, or perhaps those lobbyist bribes are can be accepted and are the reward for doing the people’s business. The Republican Party cannot be the party of corruption, that position is already occupied by the Democratic Party.

Granted; many House and Senate members were placed in compromising positions by pressures from the White House and other sources. But; this is where true character can be measured. Compromise is the Devil’s business, and anyone who caves into it against party lines; is measured as such. Has the Republican Party decomposed beyond redemption? Not quite! There is still hope, but this will require a gigantic effort by all to resell the Republican Party to voters in 2008’s election for president. Maybe; like Israel coming to the Promised Land the first time. That only took two years but; because of failure on the participants part; they were driven back into the wilderness for thirty-eight more years. The total-forty years overall-a long time to wander in the wilderness!

 

I’m in this to win! Can we be so blessed? The sainted one has entered the race for president! I just don’t understand the fascination-obsession over this person. What does she really have going that obeisance seems obligatory? Is this some kind of Egyptian Queen? I just cannot grab onto the fascination for this has been!

The MSM seems to write exposes on anyone they don’t like or are not connected to their Socialist/Communist agenda. Is this a requirement for adoration/adulation-Marx mouth? My problem (and there are many) with MSM reporting is truthfulness. Reporters should report the facts, not the figments. Factual reporting is a prerequisite for any news media worth their salt. Can you just see these reporters lying under oath in a courtroom where you must tell the truth under penalty of law? If the MSM would take the time to report the absolute facts regarding the sainted one, it would be impossible to see her as president of the USA.

How much should you overlook; the smaller things, or should you just overlook the larger items; or just overlook everything? This Bimbo Queen should be given a full revelation. Itemize everything; from the evil she has committed, and the unlikely good she has been deified for, and then present this information to the voting public. Exposes like-this political diva throwing things including temper tantrums when she can’t have her way should be made known! If she is elected president she could have a PMS moment and… And that insipid don’t look at me policy she employed while she was first (insert worst here) lady, is beyond what normal people would act like! What’s with his?

What is it going to take to jar the media into investigative mode? When are the real reporters going to dig into the credentials of these prospective candidates? You can be rest assured that the smut peddlers will exhume the dirt and dead bodies of the opposition. Call in the goon squad for backup in case someone gets too close to the truth while you’re at it. The Clinton machine would make the Mafioso pale in comparison. Whatever it takes to get to that office will be employed as stratagem. And prevarications will top the list. The following points of proven liabilities will probably only enhance her resume in the MSM and liberals minds.

On May 16, 1996, the Senate Whitewater committee votes to subpoena FBI reports showing that Hillary Clinton's fingerprints were found on hundreds of pages of Rose law Firm documents found in the White House residence quarters in January. The records, subpoenaed in 1994, and had been missing. In a two-page affidavit to Senate Whitewater investigators on June 17th, Hillary Clinton states that she "does not know" how her Rose Law Firm billing records ended up in the White House.

Hillary Clinton became the first “first lady” to testify before a grand jury when she was subpoenaed by the Whitewater grand jury.

Took a $100,000 bribe, camouflaged as futures trades, from Tyson Foods Inc. Speculated in Health Care industry futures while overseeing legislative reform of same. Failed to correct false testimony by co-defendant Ira Magaziner in Health Care trial. Obstructed justice by ordering the shredding of Vince Foster's documents in the Rose Law Firm. Ordered members of the Health Care Task Force to shred documents that were the target of a court probe. Ordered the removal of documents from Vince Foster's office and told aides to lie about their removal of documents. Obstructed justice by keeping her billing records, a document sought under subpoena, in the White House residence. Lied to investigators about her knowledge about billing records. Lied to investigators about her involvement in the Castle Grande land flip con. Ordered the use of the FBI to discredit Travel Office employees. Lied to investigators about her involvement in the firing of Travel Office Employees. A Federal judge orders a trial on July 25, 1994 to determine if Hillary Clinton's heath care task force illegally operated in secret. The White House finally releases more than 2,000 documents on June 25, 1996, relating to the travel office firings, originally requested two years prior by congressional investigators. In lieu of all of these criminal escapades, I can’t help but wonder! What is her attraction to acts of criminality, and her husband’s philandering? Is this an adrenaline rush for Hillary? Is she turned on by all of this? Is she some kind of voyeur? And why does she seemingly exhibit a ball crunching attitude towards anyone in her way! These are remarkable psychological conditions worth investigating! Is there a Doctor in the house?

 

This just can’t be good for you, constant pictorial presentations of THOSE presidential candidates! Absolutely preposterous this preliminary to what fool will be the next president-photo op! Oh! And that hag Hillary, pictured with the so-called intelligent hand under her chin poses? If you believe she is the anointed, the one the whole world is looking for; then you have lost your ever loving mind right along with the rest of the MSM sycophants!

I remember when Bill was elected to the office of President. I personally took a long term Sabbatical and refused to look at him, refused to listen to him, refused to read anything about him during the entire time he was in office. (“In whose eyes a reprobate is despised”). Since that time however; I have turned my anti-Bill & Hill loathing into a productive vein. I read books that show these two for exactly what they are. And now I do my best to warn anyone who will listen, the dangers these people present in any office they could occupy besides garbage collector. We would be somewhat safe if they would take a permanent leave of absence.

If you want to vote for the Black Widow spider lady, please do some research on her and Bill (and Bill comes with) first. And after researching this Foster killing femme fatale, you decide to vote for her, it’s on you! One book that I believe was never challenged for veracity is Ambrose Evans-Pritchard’s book called The Secret Life of Bill Clinton (the unreported stories.) After reading this documented account of these two assassins, you would do well to take out some life insurance if these two are scheduled to appear in your town or state. Am I being over cautious here? No; death seems to follow them like the black plague in the Middle Ages. It is not coincidental that people die after being around them or after having business dealings with them. It’ a wonder that Paula Jones (or any other mistress of Bill’s) still walks this earth! Perhaps killing all of those lovers would seem a little too obvious?

This is going to be a rough time for any good Blue Dog Democrat pre-presidential race warm-up period. A constant barrage of possibilities and speculations will abound. And: only the best news facilities will refuse to op into this madness. They will continue to report the truth-sans these ubiquitous photos; and I will be thankful for that!

Wow! The “Glamour Shots” presentation by those newly (really?) crowned leaders, “I got the Power” Pelosi, along with other has-beens and failures. What happened? Now we are subjected to those same female dictators sans make-up and they really look bad. Can we say wicked witch from Wizard of Oz bad? Do not! Repeat! Do not show any pictures of these hags without their glamour shots make-up on to your children or pets. It will only traumatize them and they will be mentally crippled for life! I know I couldn’t dwell on their photos very long! Could hardly believe they were one and the same.

But isn’t that what it’s really like overall? Take away their façade and see them as they really are, and they are scary! These chameleons disguise their real motives and agendas, because if the general public becomes wise to their shenanigans, the jig is up as they say. Political Mardi Gras would describe them to a T. Their lives are spent in masquerade and charade. Remember that game Charades? These do it for real! Oh boy! We are doomed! One thing they cannot cover too readily is their eyes. Remember that song line “you can’t hide your lying eyes?” The Eagles did that song it seems like eons ago, but it still rings true.

Another song line? “Smiling faces, smiling faces sometimes they don't tell the truth, uh, Smiling faces, smiling faces tell lies and I got proof. Beware, beware of the handshake that hides the snake I'm telling you beware, beware of the pat on the back

It just might hold you back Jealousy (jealousy), Misery (misery), Envy!” Recorded by the Undisputed Truth! Wow! Does that ever hit home with these lying snakelike infidels? This brings that old two-faced cliché to mind when you add up the components of what I’ve said so far! The hags; sans make-up or with “Glamour Shots” make-up on; present two different faces and two different people, the one a fake, the other, the true ugly person without the mask.

Perhaps an exact FBI like profile should be scheduled for these two faced people. A psychological wouldn’t hurt either. The public has a right to know the kind of people that rule over them. Mental disorders should not be a qualifier for elective office; I think we have progressed beyond Rome and the Middle Ages, haven’t we?

The hags; Sans Makeup people in the news recently consisted of Pelosi, Boxer, and of course Hillary, MSM are obsessed with Hillary, or should I say were? Seems like they are fickle also, Obama is the flavor of the day now! Wonder who does his makeup?

 Another brain dead fossil arises from the Democrat scrap heap. Verbally abusing our fine Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, she joins in with the illegitimates already exhibiting their mental retardations. Good grief Boxer; what did Ms. Rice ever do to you that merits this kind of vilification-bad day at the ranch Boxer? And Barbara; (can I call you that?) you most certainly do not have my respect! I have never liked you! And you have the unmitigated gall to say things like this to someone more honorable than you?

Oh! Remember Communist Rules for Revolution? Remember this rule?
“Destroy the peoples' faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and. (speak against, condemnatory utterances)” Just thought I’d throw that into the mix here!

The Low Blow by Boxer:

“Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., noted Rice has no children of her own to lose overseas.”Who pays the price?" Boxer repeatedly demanded. "You're not going to pay a particular price," she told Rice, because the secretary has no "immediate family" at risk.”
"Who pays the price? I'm not going to pay a personal price," Boxer said. "My kids are too old, and my grandchild is too young."
Then, to Rice: "You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family."

I was really sorry to hear that Boxer has any offspring, without doubt the spawn of Satan! Born Barbara Levi-Jewish no less-she is certainly no mensch in her outburst against Ms. Rice! This person is devoid of any good deeds! Barbara; what’s the real problem here, Ms. Rice’s color? Secretary Rice being a conservative black woman? Or did she leave the Democrat plantation where (shall we use that old term for black people here?) Negroes are still considered the chattel of the Democratic Party?

There is something seriously wrong with anyone who acts like Boxer et al. Why the nasty disposition, panties in a bunch? Prozac supply running low? Forget your depends and had a little accident? Something is causing a meltdown in this Party! It now appears as the party of venom! Venomous words, venomous thoughts, venomous actions! And you can certainly remember who the snake/serpent represents in the Bible? Same here I’m afraid. There is just no reason for this incivility towards Ms. Rice, President Bush, or anyone else who disagrees with you Boxer!

 
"Speak softly and carry a big stick, and you will go Far.", the famous quote by President Theodore Roosevelt.

The Big Stick policy is described as:

“Big Stick Diplomacy, a nickname coined by Roosevelt in quoting the old African proverb “Speak softly and carry a big stick, and you will go far,” was the foreign policy that was later called the Roosevelt Corollary. It is an addition to the Monroe Doctrine of 1823. The Roosevelt Corollary stated that the United States had the right to enforce an “international police power” over the Western Hemisphere. It affirmed that other countries did not have the authority to cause unrest in the Western Hemisphere, most specifically in reference to conflicts between Europe and Latin America in the early 1900’s.

Eventually, the phrase “Big Stick” was used in reference to any foreign policy that made negotiations with diplomatic grace, backed by the possible threat of military force.”

(Jennifer Garner, World Politics 116, Vincent Ferraro, Mount Holyoke College)

With this in your face incivility by cowards posing as men, we should be considering President Roosevelt’s approach to dealing with these terrorists. Are we using enough military force in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other terrorist locations? You might say yes; but is the force we are using sufficient? No; we are not generating enough pressure to cause these infidels to yield. Where are Generals like Patton and MacArthur when you need them? These real time men never bowed to pressure while doing their jobs in their assigned command locations. They finished the job.

One of the major disappointments President Bush has suffered; has been the lack of co-operation from the opposing party and the anti-war establishment. President Bush wanted to work with the opposing party and stretched forth his hand in friendship and peace across the isle. But knowing the mentality and personality profiles of these errant failures, I personally thought; that this friendly gesture would be a waste of time. And; I was right. A leopard cannot change its spots, and that party cannot change their worthless ideologue. To me stretching your hand across the isle would be like sticking your hand into an angry Rottweiler’s mouth. He will just chew it off! (According to statistics these dogs are the most often involved in fatal attacks on humans.) Not much difference here, is there?

Should we hold the sword of Damocles over the heads of our enemies? Should we offer peace to these terrorists? Yes we should; but; when they refuse terms of peace and respond with acts of aggression, we should drop that big stick right in their midst. The wicked can never know any peace. And this applies to enemies foreign and domestic. We should rally behind President Bush and the Generals in charge of this anti-terrorist operation until it is finished! Already there are too many Islamists in the USA. And soon we will live to regret this allowance. As it was once said “pay me now, or pay me later” so; what’s it going to be?

 
The loss of Conservatism is now becoming a major concern. Has America shifted their ideals and values away from the conservative way and now predispose their thoughts and lifestyles towards liberalism? The excess that seems available, i.e. money, food, alcohol, drugs, and sex; would lead you to believe that America has become one big place to party. There seems to be no restraint and no stopping point. America is faced with several health problems that can be attributed to excess, and it finds itself in crises mode. The obesity problem now making headlines will drain America’s financial resources in the not too distant future. Who’s going to pay for the health care that will be needed?

Should there be self-control in America? Should food consumption (portion control) regulations be imposed? What about controlling alcohol consumption? Drugs are controlled by the government as they are classified, prescription only or; if they are illegal. OTC drugs can be purchased legally. What I am trying to say here is simply this: If people cannot control their appetite and their drinking habits, something must be done to save them from themselves! Super size meals are offered as standard menu items. These meals now designed for one person in all reality could feed two people. These portions are now glutton size and promoted as big man meals. Consider the chunky soup meals promoted by athletes and their mothers now! Not everyone is the same size as Pro Football players or Sumo Wrestlers, but; they soon will be if this keeps up! And it won’t be muscular bodies either!

The lack of self-control is apparent in the lives of politicians also. They seem to think the taxpayers pockets are a never ending supply of money for their pockets and personal pet projects. The largesse of giving taxpayers money freely to other countries and insipid causes, makes these politicians appear like the Roman Senators did-today! The Romans lost control of everything and rapidly deteriorated into destruction because of it. They indulged in everything to excess! Food was a pleasure! Sex was a pleasure! Drinking to excess was a pleasure. Power was sought after and something to be had at any costs by wicked leadership minded people. The parallels to America are unmistakable, and you can’t count Europe out of the mix either. Most of Europe was under Roman control at one time.

The people of America have been weakened by excessive living. Their bodies are weakened because of improper diet and lack of self-control. Drugs; either legal or illegal have taken their toll also! The conservative lifestyle seems like a thing of the past. How many candidates running for the office of the President of the USA-2008, are values driven, conservative minded, and can also be found with good morals? Consider the field, consider their agenda and consider their overall track record. President Bush was supposed to be a moderate to right thinking individual. But to be honest with you, at times I had a hard time distinguishing him from any other run of the mill liberal.

With largesse, excess and a never ending supply of things to destroy yourself with, we are faced with choices; either bring things under control or perish!

 
Regardless what they say; the haunting question remains. Who are the Democrats really working for; some foreign entity? Right now it doesn’t look like the USA. It appears that everything that is good for the USA meets opposition from the Democratic Party and liberals in general. They are opposed to a good economy! Why? They are opposed to victory in Iraq? Why? They are opposed to drilling for our own oil! Why? No matter what is good for the development and continuation of America; they oppose it! At this time in our history, their allegiance to America should be challenged. And I am serious when I say this!

Would any good American have any problem announcing their loyalties to America? I believe every good and true American loves this country and would tell you so! I am in doubt as to the loyalties of those who continually try to tear apart the infrastructure of America. And this is being done through the legal system. Agenda driven Judges! ACLU fueled lawsuits against everything they just don’t like! What is the basis for this apparent resentment of America?

I believe I know; and have known for a long time their actual party affiliation and loyalties. Their true allegiance is with another time and with rulers/leaders long since dead. I am talking about that old red flag party-the Communist Party! Let Stalin speak! They would hear! Let Lenin speak! They would hear! Let Karl Marx speak-They would bow down! Every action or inaction of theirs is right out of the Communist rulebook for throwing a country into confusion and rebellion! Communist Rules for Revolution presents a set of goals for destroying a country from within! And no; I’m not some conspiracy theorist either! Here are some of the Communist agenda driven goals:

1. Get control of all means of publicity. Get peoples' minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays and other trivialities.

2. Divide people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance.

3. Destroy the peoples' faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and. (speak against, condemnatory utterances)

4. Always preach; true democracy; but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.

Now take a good look at these four points taken from the Communist Rules for Revolution found in a 1919 Military Action. Can you see the Democratic Party in any of these rules? If not; you must be blind! Point one-closing Congress for the BCS game for instance? Point two-constant whining and accusations by Democrat leaders! Point three-always deriding and trying to minimize President Bush, VP Cheney, Secretary of State Rice; and other key central figures of the opposing party! Point four-self explanatory! B&H Clinton is a perfect (bad) example here!

You should really read the entire set of “Communist Rules for Revolution” for even more insight. The following is true and can be verified. This was read into record as described! How long will Americans refuse to see the Democrat Party agenda-Communism? Just Google the following for extended information.

Communist Goals (1963)

Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35

January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals

EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Thursday, January 10, 1963

“Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:

There is more evidence than can be effectively read or presented in any blog or article that only allows brief examples due to space requirements. I believe it is time for all Americans of good will to awaken to the actualities of the Democrat Party; and their real time intents for America and its people! Can we say 21^st century slavery here? Total control?

From WND.com: Posted: January 14, 2007 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

"I invoke and summon the constituent power, the people's power, the real fuel, so that the engines I am talking about may lead us to a better future," he said at the swearing-in ceremony where he declared "the new era on the road to socialism."

"Those of you who want to know what type of socialism I have planned for Venezuela should read Marx and Lenin," he said.

Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez—At least he admits it!

 
At this moment in time, I don’t know which is worse; Republican losses or; seeing those horrible faces in the news cycle everyday now? Whose faces? Why that old Submarine Captain; Ted Kennedy, Madame Dingbat Nancy Pelosi and that never dying immortal know-it-all Joe Biden, Murtha, et al. This is truly the Rocky Horror show; and it’s downright scary son! Will the ruination of America come at the hands of these incompetents? Isaiah 3:6 …”Be you our ruler, and let this ruin be under your hand.” If some of the old Conservative Blue Dog Democrats were in charge, not to worry mate! Democrats like Zell Miller, John Breaux, et al. And Joe Lieberman is in a class by himself!

This is definitely not your father and mother’s Democratic Party! Although you may not have agreed with everything the old Democrats stood for, at least they worked for the common man at one time. Personally; my people were registered Democrats, but I did not follow their lead, and today I am certainly glad I didn’t! This is beyond anything the Party founders had in mind. You just can’t please all of the people all of the time, and you can’t be all things to all people. Stretching yourself and any political party that far will cause fissures and gaping holes inside the party’s comprehensive ideals and obtainable goals; the demands then become greater than the party’s capabilities.

The Democrats (this past election cycle) ran on nothing and were elected for and on nothing. There is no mandate/s to be found so far. Perhaps they perceive such, but where is the proof of that? The narrow voter margins belay any mandates. Landslides give mandates, remember President Reagan? Remember 1994, so why the change in leadership? That terrible war in Iraq is just taking too long! Oh really! If they would let the soldiers fight this war the way they should; it would be over by now! Remember the “shock and awe” technique that was halted? Remember Hiroshima? Nagasaki? Dresden? And the results were? Surrender by the enemy? Remember? People are looking for a panacea, and the penultimate Messiah like leader! Soon that deceptive person will arise and then…?

I have always found the best leaders are team oriented. They choose the best qualified people as sub-leaders and let them work at their best possible levels; and good positive results are produced. However; on the other side of the coin are obsessed leaders with no one else in mind but themselves! They focus on keeping the spotlight on themselves alone and the rest can; as someone said-“let them eat cake.” Selfish leadership is the harbinger of ruination. It would appear that this current leadership cycle is saturated in the all about me syndrome… This is truly the Kiss of Death!

P.S And incidentally; what is the Democrat plan for the Iraq solution? What would you do?

 
President Bush’s message on Wednesday evening struck a chord among many. How much longer should the American people wait for any sign of total victory in Iraq? Actually; we have won the war and what remains is clean-up and stabilizing occupation. Remember Japan? Remember Germany? We still have occupation troops in both places, not to mention Korea!

What is the solution for disengagement in Iraq? Should we just withdraw our troops and leave everything to the remaining Iraqis? No; but there should be an ultimatum. Either or! A final date should be established to accomplish everything necessary to sustain total Iraqi control. And then--If the deadline comes and the goals are not met, leave Iraq period. And don’t look back!

Word has reached us (if we are listening?) that our troops just “want to do their job.” What does that entail? It means having the ability to finalize some dissidents. Going into any area in Iraq and completing the mission needs. I am trying to say this:--Many more Iraq’s should be dispatched. It’s time to remove the handcuffs from the fighting Allied forces. Few people remember the cowardice displayed in Viet Nam by those fighting against the US Forces. Women and children were sacrificed as they assumed proximity positions to our men and then blew themselves up. Guerrilla warfare, Geneva rules of engagement? No--Dishonorable warfare and this caused some massacres i.e. My Lai. Our Fighting men were fed up as they are getting to be now in almost the same situations, déjà vu? This same paradigm is being followed by the Iraqi terrorists-cowards!

I believe collateral damage is the by-product of any wars serious application. You must expect this in any war. Japan’s two cities that were bombed by Fat Man and Little Boy were decimated. Germany was also the recipient of devastating bomb runs. Don’t forget what they did to earn that payback! Personally; I’m in favor of bombing these infidels (we can use their same terminology also) back to the Stone Age. Let the survivors rebuild the country (or countries if necessary) with the residual, and let them realize that Islam is not the chosen way. This bleeding heart warfare just doesn’t work with these Islam conditioned people. Besides; it will provide long term Iraqi employment, and this is what some of them are crying for now! Don’t you just love it when a plan comes together?

Most soldiers really want to do good wherever they can. Our soldiers are very compassionate and will extend a helping hand whenever asked. And; America is just like that at its core. We were raised at a higher level than most countries around the world. Just look at the billions of dollars that we have sent abroad during our existence. How many countries are following our pattern? How many countries are willing to join our efforts in eradicating these evil insurgents? Only a few I’m afraid! What a shame; because in unity there is strength.

Plan B should include a pre-emptive strike just to show the enemy that we are very serious about final resolution to this continuing problem. I know it seems a little radical, but I guarantee you this; it will be effective! We may now have to go as far as Fat Man and Little Boy, we can use mini-nukes and precision or pinpoint bombing and achieve the same results. Less is more sometimes! I believe we should have continued the “shock and awe” plan until they quit! However; when you have to deal with political intervention, you already operate with handicaps! The same cry baby mentality existed during Viet Nam! Remember the movie “First Blood” and the point? Rambo/USA will give you a war you won’t believe! Verstehen Sie ?

 
Headline: Townhall.com

House Democrats and ethics reform:

“The new House Democratic majority has announced its "conversion" on matters of institutional and individual ethics…”

I’ll never run out of writing topics as long as Democrats are in control (oh really?) of the House. Democrats--Ethics reform? Is this a contradiction in terms or what? It seems like smoke and mirrors overall. A cold day in you know where would occur first. If they were really serious about ethics reform (oh that would happen?) there is an itinerary that would prove their sincerity. Difficult to implement, but not impossible, a real House cleaning, followed by a serious Senate sweep. This would of course mean the removal of various ethics violators from both places. Irregardless of Party affiliations!

I believe the lines between entitlements and ethics violations have become obscured. The not so hidden message signaled by constant violations, is that these violators really believe they are entitled to the spoils of being elected to public office. Perhaps a lesson and refresher concerning ethics is needed here!

Ethics

Encyclopedia of Political Information. Ethics is the general term for attempts to state or determine what is good, both for the individual and for the society as a whole. It is often termed the science of morality.

Divisions of Ethics

In analytic philosophy, ethics is traditionally divided into three fields: Metaethics, Normative ethics and applied ethics.

We will refresh ourselves on normative ethics for application’s sake.

Normative Ethics

Normative ethics bridges the gap between metaethics and applied ethics. It is the attempt to arrive at practical moral standards that tell us right from wrong, and how to live moral lives.

• One branch of normative ethics is theory of conduct; this is the study of right and wrong, of obligation and permissions, of duty, of what is above and beyond the call of duty, and of what is so wrong as to be evil. Theories of conduct propose standards of morality, or moral codes or rules. For example, the following would be the sort of rules that a theory of conduct would discuss (though different theories will differ on the merit of each of these particular rules): "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"; "The right action is the action that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number"; "Stealing is wrong."

Pigs in their natural surroundings have no scruples, ethics, cares, or concerns with anyone or anything but themselves. They are only concerned about where their next meal is coming from. They have no morals as they only seek to satisfy their carnal lusts and needs. Can you see the parallel to those elected officials that feel “entitled” to graze, devour, play, and reject the morality of ethics? And all of these takers are operating on the public’s expense account—Taxes!

I agree; there should be ethics reform but; who should the reformers be? Corrupted officials? Corrupted House and Senate representatives? The fox is in the henhouse here, and no good will come from it, only more devouring and vitiation.

 
HEADLINE: Newsmax.com

Hillary Plotting to Derail Obama Plans

“Hillary Clinton regards fellow Senator Barack Obama as her biggest obstacle to the Democratic nomination for president in 2008, and is already mapping out strategy to derail an Obama campaign.

Clinton believes enthusiasm for an Obama run would diminish as voters get the message about his lack of experience in government and foreign affairs.”

How pathetic can she be? The program of enemy (real or perceived) elimination continues with this recalcitrant individual. This witch with a B continues with her body count to the top agenda. What is she going to do to Obama? Maybe she will Fosterize him? If someone becomes an obstacle or excess baggage, she simply hits the delete button, arrangements are made, and a terrible accident JUST HAPPENS? Oh Please!

Will somebody slap the stupid out of anyone wanting her for President? Is this how it works, Black Widow spider your way to the top of the heap? Leaving behind mass ruination in your wake?--Pun Intended! I seriously hope for a truth revelation concerning this Evil Woman? Stay at home mom bake chocolate brownies image? Can we say Ma Barker image would be a lot closer here? Obama! You left the plantation and you’re going to pay for this!

I do not have a problem with any GOOD woman occupying the office of President of the USA! I am in no way misogynistic in beliefs. Someone like Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice piques my interest. Color has nothing to do with being a qualifier in this arena, only ability! She must be one of the most intelligent women on this planet, and I certainly respect that defining quality in her!

On the other hand; Hillary is only low rent and Arkansas friendly. I believe she reached her zenith when she lived there. Oh you might say—she’s the Senator from New York now! And I’ll respond with—what do they know? Their major newspaper is the New York Times; and that dear friend says it all! Not to mention allowing that carpet bagging Clinton duo to move in and take over. This gives them the DUH award; hands down!

 
Where do they get those ideas you may wonder sometimes. Many college campuses are rife with activist teachers introducing radical revolutionary ideas! Revolution against what, the system, the government, society in general! No; the revolution for incorporating a socialistic system. Remember Lenin, Stalin, and Marx? These leaders and their radical ideals never seem to die. And incidentally; these were all promulgators of failed governmental systems. Forced compliance accompanied their doctrine of governance. Disobey? Off to the Gulags for you!

We are really facing a dilemma, on one hand radical Islamists, on the other, radical leftists--can we say Socialists here? Both of these are forced agendas. The Islamist wants you to convert to Islam or die, while the Socialists would like to kill any freedoms you might enjoy. They want class enslavement, room only for the two class system, the workers or the proles, and the elites or leaders. The proles did not have the intellectual power to understand that they are exploited by the Party (as a source of cheap labor) and were unable and/or unwilling to organize resistance. Their functions were simple: work and breed. And no complaining or they take things away from you, or elevate the price of commodities until you get the picture—Control—Theirs!

Now there’s a plan? One of the many mentors (can we insert mental here?) that paved the crooked pathway of Bill & Hillary Clinton, was Saul D Alinsky. Alinsky produced a rulebook and a system of revolutionary ideas concerning rebellion against the system. The book titled, Rules For Radicals, formatted a plan for radicals to upset governments that are opposed to their ideals. Their plans could be considered an anarchist’s cookbook for lazy rebellious people who never grew up and accepted their responsibilities in life. Hillary was more than intrigued by Alinsky’s doctrine and writings. She has followed this playbook/cookbook since she came into contact with Alinsky and others idealistically aligned. She then left the reservation; proverbially speaking of course. She was once a Republican! Can you believe it? What changed her? A little thing called college, a hotbed of liberalism and socialistic ideals being taught by radical professors.

Alinsky acknowledges the original source of all rebellion as follows:

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to, know where mythology leaves off and history begins—or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom-Lucifer.”

—SAUL ALINSKY

With Lucifer as the example cited for the original source of rebellion, you should be alarmed at Akinsky’s choice of inspiration, but he is only following other leaders of darkness. When you read books like, Brotherhood of Darkness, you will see the source of the Brotherhood’s power, Satan. (Darkness was not just used as a filler word here for the title.) Like Lucifer many only want/desire their own kingdom, no matter what the cost or who they have to kill! How many bodies now Bill? Hillary?

Bill & Hillary are definitely children of darkness. Their true mentor i.e. Alinsky and others who pursue total power is; Lucifer. So in effect when you vote for the likes of the Clinton’s et al, you are desirous of Lucifer’s ruler ship over you!

It makes me wonder at times; are these Presidential candidates so elevated in their own mind, that reason and commons sense no longer applies? What makes these people think they can rule the world, or even part of it? So many potential leaders, (posers?-quasi?) really believe they are the gift to the world. Study the historical record of earth’s many rulers, examine those that ruled various countries and kingdoms, were they really a gift to the people they ruled over, a gift that keeps on giving, like--misery, poverty, oppression, slavery, imprisonment? A vote for Hillary and her ilk is a vote for all of these!

More on this subject, comments invited?

 
Looking her Glamour Shots best, Pelosi proclaiming that she is the most powerful woman in America, the Democratic Party now takes over. Did she clear that powerful woman statement with Hillary? Anyway; one of the entertainment acts (let the party begin) was the surviving members of the Grateful Dead. How fitting I thought, have the Dead celebrate with the living dead Democratic Party. Was this symbolic? Or was this a sign, i.e. a true reality check?

It was apparent that Madam Dingbat was more than ecstatic. I hope she was wearing her depends; this kind of excitement causes embarrassing accidents, especially to someone of her age. And welcoming those Congressman whose escapades were actually criminal, that really must have been hard? No, not at all, for if she was angered at their criminal behavior she would have refused to even shake their hand. Power does strange things to people, especially those fossils whose resurrection from the dead is nothing short of miraculous. Are the dead grateful? Remains to be seen!

You can smell “High Noon” coming as Pelosi assumes power in the House! She will try and augment her dingbat ideas only to be met by ancient people and ancient ways, the original Grateful Dead; i.e. those House fossils of the Democratic Party. These antiquated remnants from the Ice Age or beyond, will offer her resistance on any ideas she might have, gaining their help will certainly challenge her leadership abilities. Can’t we all just get along? This will be a pissing contest beyond your wildest dreams. You already know that Jane Harman is really mad for being passed over for a chair position she really deserves! This will hopefully cause some serious infighting, and this will be good for America. As long as you can keep them away from doing any harm on issues like more taxation, the better it will be for all concerned. Power struggles always keep some people focused elsewhere, like their own personal territory. The territorial marking process has officially begun!

This is going to be a hoot! We bloggers will have more material than we can write about. There will be some hilarious material available to tide us over until America comes to its senses once again. Maybe by the then GOP will actually listen and figure out what really happened? Don’t hold your breath though!