Well now: The dingbat was forced into recanting another selection for a prominent post within the Democratic Party. With the de-selection of Alcee Hastings for the Intel chair, it’s back to square one for Nancy “Dingbat” Pelosi! And that’s the beauty of being a dingbat, you can always change your mind! Like; Oh! Silly me what was I thinking? Oops! Made a boo boo! Maybe that wasn’t such a good idea after all!

ding·bat (ding'bat')

n.

Slang. An empty-headed or silly person.

The vacuous minded Pelosi can claim a blank moment, or-the devil made me do it kind of decision. You can be sure there was politics behind her choice. Why would you choose such an incompetent person like Hastings in the first place? Who was really behind that selection, Pelosi?

The term coveted position, came up after the de-selection. Who coveted that position and what were they willing to pay for it? Plenty I’ll bet! Two cards in the deck of selection are liberals and the Black Caucus. Alcee is both! The selection she was trying to bypass (Jane Harman) held the more moderate position that neither the liberals (insert Pelosi here) nor the Black Caucus wanted. Jane Harmon’s position mirrored the opinions of the general public, closer than Pelosi wanted. Perhaps Pelosi didn’t have any choice in this selection, giving her the benefit of the doubt. Again maybe she did.

Pelosi is the perfect foil in all of this. The real powers that be can shovel the blame right upon her shoulders, and she can use her dingbat status to evade any consequences. It is good to see her choices checked before any confirmations can take place. There are still some clear thinking individuals, regardless of careless intent by some! Makes you wonder who they really wanted in that position? It does appear that graft, is a prerequisite for anyone applying for positions under this dingbat! Take a bribe? This is necessary on their resumes. All manner of corruption acceptable by these applicants!

It sure provides people like me with some good material to write and speak about, when individuals like Pelosi are placed in power. Also, we can really feel good about ourselves knowing that there is no way under creation any of us could be like Pelosi, could we? Hope not!

 

Now that the Democrats are in power, (only marginally) the get even process begins. Henry Waxman D. California wants to lead the charge, or so it seems. He will be assisted by that openly gay Congressman, Barney Frank. Frank wants to see homosexuals serving in the Armed Forces without fear of being discharged for their sexual persuasion. (Insert perversion here!) More on him later!

Why does the pot always want to call the kettle black? The Democratic Party has been rotting from within for decades. That septic tank with the likes of Ted Kennedy, The Clintons, et al, will never be known for their morality, with the one exception, election time! Then they become Bible thumping, scripture quoting (albeit erroneously) righteous individuals. But you will notice, when the elections are over however; off come the “I Believe” costume and its business as usual.

One of their primary targets is; Vice President Dick Cheney. Why? When someone hates a person because they can’t control him, they become desperately evil in their quest to break that person. Do you want another reason for their evil attacks? The Democrats cannot stand successful people outside of their party values. Which means; they only celebrate success if the person is of their Socialist, Communist, Fascist persuasion. Vice President Cheney is neither. Cheney is a principled man with American values intrinsic in his character make-up. His upbringing is far removed from their ideals!

Another target is John Bolton. Bolton is outstanding in his representation of the USA at UN Council meetings. His no-nonsense approach has positioned America in a much stronger stance since his appointment for this position. I wish the Democratic Party would realize the good he has done and will continue to do if his appointment becomes permanent. I think the Democrats need to give President Bush a bone on this one.

Speaking of which, President Bush has tried to be co-operative, and also amicable with many members of the hostile segment within the Democratic Party, for instance Ted Kennedy. He even invited this reprobate to the White House for popcorn and a movie at one time. I can assure you if I was in President Bush’s position, that evil person would not even get close to that type of invite! Kennedy belongs in jail!

Another hatchet man for the Democrats is that old has been fairy, Barney Frank! He wants to make changes in the military to include homosexuals among the fighting forces. And he’s an example? He wants limp wrists to be among this nations finest! My position on the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, are not even close when it comes to allowing homosexuals to serve in the military.  The "don't ask, don't tell" policy allows tolerance!

The way I see it is this: If the Democrats are allowed to pursue their agenda concerning investigations, where will they stop, impeachment of President Bush? They are only seeking payback for Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Clinton deserved everything he got, and more! Bill Clinton, and his wife Hillary, are downright evil! And the sooner people realize it, the better for America it will be. You just do not want these people in the White House again!

These so-called investigations are only methods of getting even. Masquerading as we need to know exactly what happened and how much was spent is a charade! The people of America spoke against O.J. Simpson’s movie and book, and it had overwhelming results. Let’s do the same with this travesty as well! The first investigations should be within the Democratic Party. Clean your own house first, you hypocrites!

 

Well Madam Dingbat* you are off to a good start? With your first selection of Cut-and-Run emasculated John Murtha for Majority Leader of the House. Who would have believed a Marine would loose their masculinity? Go figure! Why you selected this individual to lead any committee is beyond rational thinking individuals. I guess you only know the answer to that question? Thankfully, the real intelligence in the House prevailed, with the selection of Steny Hoyer to be the Majority Leader. I think we dodged a bullet here!

*ding·bat

n.

1. Slang An empty-headed or silly person.

2. An object, such as a brick or stone, used as a missile.

3. Slang An unspecified gadget or other small article, especially one whose name is unknown or forgotten.

4. Printing A typographical ornament or symbol.

Your next choice Madam Dingbat can be explained. The way I see it is this: You needed someone on the Intelligence Committee to keep our enemies informed. Someone has to get the Intel to the New York Times and our enemies! Alcee will do that with minimal costs. The last time he accepted a bribe he only charged $150,000. And what’s a little bribe money among friends? There is plenty to go around, isn’t there? Now here is his explanation in today’s news.

Hastings claims right to be Intelligence chair
Letter cites his credentials, calls his impeachment in 1988 politics

By GREG MILLER
Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — Competition to head the House Intelligence Committee intensified Wednesday with the release of a letter by Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., who says he deserves the job despite the Senate convicting him and removing him as a federal judge after being impeached for involvement in a bribery plot.

Hastings, in a letter sent to Democratic House members, said critics were bent on "denying me a position I have certainly earned and am completely competent to perform."

Hastings is, by seniority, the committee's second-ranking Democrat, after Rep. Jane Harman of California. But Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the incoming speaker of the House, has indicated that when the Democrats take control in January, she plans to take Harman off the committee in favor of someone more critical of the Bush administration's policies on the war in Iraq.

Hastings, 70, would be in line to become chairman of the panel, formally known as the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

He had declined repeated requests for comment, but ended that silence Wednesday. It is unclear whether the five-page missive would help his case or hurt it.

In the letter, Hastings decries the "misinformed and sometimes venomous attacks on my integrity and character by pundits, politicians, and editors."

He stresses that he was removed from the bench even though he had been acquitted in a 1983 criminal trial stemming from allegations that he had conspired to accept a $150,000 bribe in return for granting a lenient sentence to two defendants.

Despite that acquittal, a federal judicial panel referred the case to Congress; in 1988, Hastings was impeached by the House. The following year, by a vote of 69 to 26, the Senate convicted him on eight of 17 articles of impeachment and removed him from the bench.

Madam Dingbat, do you really think that Congress is that incompetent in finding him guilty? If you believe that, you are certainly living in a vacuum. 69 people (the majority) found Alcee Hastings guilty of eight articles of impeachment and ejected him from the bench! What is it Madam Dingbat that you do not understand about this?

One can only wonder what your next selections will be. Stalin, Lenin, Marx?

 
When you see the likes of Janet Reno surface once again, you know trouble is but a heartbeat away. It seems that since the Democratic Party has won the majority (by slim margins) in the House and Senate, they are opening up their coffins. An old dead politician with blood on her hands (Janet Reno) surfaced recently, with a legal attack on the Bush Administration’s policy on trying terrorists outside of the court system.

Is this the same Janet Reno who acted as judge, jury and executioner in the Waco, Texas slaughter? Is this the same Janet Reno that ordered the Ruby Ridge assassination? With blood still dripping from her hands, Reno continues to insert herself where she really doesn’t belong. Why now? Well she is a Democrat, and she served under other Serial Killers-Bill & Hillary Clinton. These wannabes also have blood dripping from their hands.

By all counts the Janet Reno body count stands at 86 deaths in Waco, TX. Because of her actions, Oklahoma City’s Federal Building was bombed. 168 people died in that incident. And don’t forget Vickie Weaver from Ruby Ridge, Idaho. And I’m sure others can be attributed to her during the execution of her public duties! Pun intended!

The Clinton’s body count (people that got in their way) is around fifty. Some place it even higher. Can we say Vince Foster here? People that crossed these two partners in crime paid the ultimate price. This count includes many of Clinton’s personal Bodyguards. Benefits and duration not too good here! Short retirement plan here?

Call it anything you like, but anyone else who was found responsible for this many deaths, could and would be labeled serial killers or mass murderers. How it is these people have escaped prosecution for these deaths? Even being indirectly linked yields the accomplice to murder charges! Which means; if any of these murdered people were even discussed by the Clintons as an enemy, and suddenly they turn up dead? You connect the dots!

The Democratic Party has a group of elites within the party, with above the law mentality. Think Teddy Kennedy here! Among this party can be found, brokers of death, and they will do what they must to gain or retain power. If the Clinton’s regain power in the form of the office of the President of the United States; more people will die. This will keep their serial killer string active and intact. Why are people blind to the likes of Janet Reno and the Clintons?

 

We have a son in Iraq that is now in harms way. We come from a military background. From the beginning of this countries origin as the United States of America, someone in our family has fought against our enemies. So nothing has changed! Now; another relative is fighting against evil civilizations. But this enemy is different! How would this enemy be different? They have political and financial ties that present a different paradigm for combat, according to previous wars.

The enemy is extremely vicious. They have been planning their subsequent hostile take over of the world, for many centuries. Historically, these so-called Arabs were the descendants of Abraham and Hagar, Sarah’s personal slave of Egyptian descent. The prophecy concerning their offspring, Ishmael, was that his descendants would be as a wild man, his hand shall be against every man, and every man's hand against him. The story can be found in Genesis chapter 16.

Also; the Arab nations have the genealogy of Esau. Esau was Jacob’s twin brother, but there the similarities end. Esau was an earthy man, and his pursuits took him away from the family’s moral objective, righteousness! Esau came to hate his brother and desired to kill him. However, other plans awaited Jacob, and the rest is historically documented in the Genesis account.

So; what does this have to do with this war? Plenty! The Arab Nations want to destroy the little nation of Israel-Now! Israel descended from Jacob, and the Arabs (all inclusive term here) descended from Ishmael and Esau. The latter descendants (Arabs) have no love for Israel or-the United States either. They wanted to impose the way of Islam upon the known world of Prince Charles time, 732 CE. Their plan was interrupted by Prince Charles (Charles Martel) in 732 CE. The story is told:

“The Muslims planned to go to Tours to destroy the Ch--ch of St. Martin, the city, and the whole country. Then came against them the glorious Prince Charles, at the head of his whole force. He drew up his host, and he fought as fiercely as the hungry wolf falls upon the stag. By the grace of Our Sovereign, he wrought a great slaughter upon the enemies of Chr--tian faith, so that---as history bears witness---he slew in that battle 300,000 men, likewise their king by name Abderrahman. Then was he [Charles] first called "Martel," for as a hammer of iron, of steel, and of every other metal, even so he dashed: and smote in the battle all his enemies. And what was the greatest marvel of all; he only lost in that battle 1500 men. The tents and harness [of the enemy] were taken; and whatever else they possessed became a prey to him and his followers. Eudes, Duke of Aquitaine, being now reconciled with Prince Charles Martel, later slew as many of the Saracens as he could find who had escaped from the battle.” [Historical Account.]

Notice that this was a religious war (Jihad) between Islam and the Chr--tians. The current war is also religious by connotation and content. Prince Charles was called “Martel” because of his actions against Islam. He smashed them as a hammer smashes things with enough force applied. So it should be with Allied Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. The powers that be should allow these (our) troops to fight and destroy the enemy with all the fierceness of Prince Charles “Martel” the hammer! Let these men fight, and destroy everything in their path, and LET THEM WIN! Let’s get unstuck from Stupid!

Take the politics and financial wherewithal, (Can we say oil here?) out of the equation. Let the chips fall where they may! After all; Armageddon is going to occur anyway, and there is nothing the human race can do about that! But! There can be a moment of pause, a time of respite before it all ends as we know it! Either way, the choices are few, but we need to make them count!

Well! You know who is in the news-again, pushing her health care programs. It just never seems to end. Why do these lame minded politicians always try to force their failed health care programs upon the public? Their health care programs are worthless at best!? Social health care doesn’t work according to their plans. Care of this order should be the responsibility of the family first, and then religious organizations next. Government should only take a hand when all else fails. And; this will prove costly if the government becomes involved.

When social minded architects become involved in cradle to the grave care, it will result in a social disaster. We already have enough social programs at work in this country as it is.

1. We have free public education. That's socialism. It means government -- that is, the people -- has decided education is so important for the nation's well-being that every kid ought to have it. The grade level of this so-called free education is only C level. This grade level is the same at the college level also. With C grade graduates what's the future of this country going to be? Dumbed down at best!

2. In 2006 patients will pay a $35 monthly premium and a yearly deductible of $250. This will cover 75 percent of the cost of drugs, up to $2,250 a year. (Thus a sizable chunk will come from the patient.) And then you find out-Above the $2,250, Medicare pays nothing until the patient has forked over $3,600 out of pocket. At that point Medicare pays 95 percent.

Someone always has to pay for educational programs, even if they fail. Someone has to pay the medical costs, even if the deductible is paid by the patients. That someone is the taxpayers! And with no end in sight! How much more are you willing to pay for an increase in socials programs that have already failed? Believe me; your taxes will increase now!

Remember the Clinton health care plan? I’ll refresh your memory!

Under Clinton's plan, you will automatically be enrolled in a government-run "health alliance." Clinton's plan states:
"It is the obligation of every eligible individual to enroll in a health plan. Anyone who does not meet the established deadline for enrollment automatically is enrolled in a health plan when he or she seeks medical care. Regional alliances assign patients who do not seek enrollment to a health plan; they automatically assign any newborn infant who is not enrolled through his or her parents to a plan."

Once you are enrolled, "health-providing institutions . . . would send all patients through medical 'gatekeepers,' who would decide what care people really need." If they decide you are too old, too sick, or too politically incorrect to be treated, they will have the power to deny you treatment, no matter what the consequences.
But regardless of how little treatment you get or how bad it is, you will still be required to pay Clinton's new health-care taxes-forever. And there's no limit on how high those taxes can be .
If the states don't obey the federal government's mandate to impose the health-care taxes Clinton wants, then, without Congressional approval :
"The Secretary of the Treasury will impose a payroll tax on all employers in the state. The payroll tax shall be sufficient to allow the federal government to provide health coverage to all individuals in the state and to reimburse the federal government for the costs of monitoring and operating the state system."

You think the Republican Administration was bad…

 

Why do you suppose the Democrats were successful in the Mid-Term elections?  Was it because they had the better political platform?  Or, was it because they had the better candidates?  Did they have the solutions to the world’s problem? They (the Democrats) are not even on the same page with any of these questions. How do you take a broken junk party and capture the House and Senate? The arrogance of power, that’s how! The Republicans were bypassing the conservative agenda that placed them in power to start with. You should always dance with the one that brought you!  They ignored their constituents, and they were punished for it.

Do you think things will get better now that Democrats are in control of the House and Senate?  Don't you even believe this for one moment! This party has forgotten the reason for its existence. They no longer actually know FDR and his agenda. They have forgotten John F. Kennedy-well not quite; they still practice his sexual weaknesses, and get away with it. (Remember Bill Clinton?) Why is this? Because they never run their campaigns on a religious proper values moral basis, in fact, they actually ran this last campaign on absolutely nothing! The Republicans do however run their campaigns appealing to the religious right in America. This time it did not work? Why? They forsook their conservative agenda! 

Also, the Republican Party failed to police its own ranks. When there is Congressmen practicing immorality in their midst, and no steps are taken to remove the problem, until it becomes National news, they have failed their party platform. When the war in Iraq becomes only a police action, i.e. Martial Law, you have failed in your agenda.  When you pick weak Judges for nomination to the Supreme Court, you are not following the conservative party line. You have failed!

It is written “in the multitude of Counselors there is safety.” Where did the Republicans turn to for its counsel, Tarot cards?  Your “thumping” was well deserved. And you certainly had it coming. As that infamous cell phone commercial says, “Can you hear me now?”