About Me

Name: Gary A McAvin
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Worst President Ever?

 

Right now, I am really fed up with Obama politics. And I know that the majority of Americans feel the same way as his popularity continues to descend in the polls. I always thought that Jimmy Carter was the worst president during my lifetime but, Obama is giving the peanut farmer from Georgia a run for his money on this! What really troubles me concerning this president is his agenda based ideologies.  Every indication leads to the ideology of communism. It turns out that one of Obama's childhood mentors was Frank Marshall Davis, a communist. Another mentor of influence was Anarchist and Communist rabble rouser, Saul Alinksy. And, he was also a major influence on Hillary Clinton’s thought process and political lifestyle. Alinsky’s son, L. David Alinsky, credits Obama for “learning his lesson well” from the Communist guru.  The obvious effort by Obama to destroy this country century’s long tenets, its religious beliefs, is displayed openly and blatantly. Obama wants to turn America into a shell that he and his cohorts are effectively gutting and reinstall socialism/communism instead. I don’t know about you, but that won’t work for me.

Former far-left radical David Horowitz, recognizes exactly what Obama is and what he is doing i.e. his agenda. Horowitz writes: “When you take a hard look at what Barack Obama already has done and plans to do, you quickly realize he is not Jimmy Carter. He is not even Bill Clinton. That’s because Barack Obama, working in concert with the ultra-liberal socialists that run the Democrat party, is radically transforming America…This isn’t like four bad years of Jimmy Carter or even eight years of Bill Clinton. This is the systematic transformation of our nation from an open, capitalist society, to a Big Brother-type socialist nation” (frontpagemag.com, 2009). Horowitz recognizes the inherent danger presented by this president and the far-left Democrats. 

As an avid listener to Glenn Beck, I can concur with Beck’s outing agenda of the Obama administration and his choices for czar position. One learns in life that people tend to surround themselves with people who believe and think like they do. Van Jones avowed communist was one of Obama’s premier selections for a czar position. Obama seeks and obtains counsel from extremist bomber, Bill Ayers. Ayers a 60’s radical was and still is anti-American. Obama associates himself with radicals such as, who could ever forget, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright? And, that old money handler, Tony Rezke, close friend and ally.    A man is known by the company he keeps and as a man thinks, so is he! Well…lest we forget that Jew hating Jew Fyou Rahm Emanuel, the foulest mouth person supposedly on staff. Someone needs to wash his mouth out with soap. 

So, I can say that Obama’s agenda and focus has not been on what is good for America, but on what he can do to destroy/change the structure of America. True, America has warts and flaws but botheration, it’s still the best country in the world.  If he thinks that he has to change America, he is sadly mistaken. What is his position anyway?  Let’s refresh ourselves on his actual responsibilities.  The following is taken from Article II of the Constitution:

Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Section 2.

The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.

He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.

The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.

Section 3.

He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States.

Section 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors” http://topics.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii

My point is summed up with this statement, promise, affirmation, "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Obama, although a supposed Constitutional teacher and scholar, is abstracted from this affirmation/pledge by example.  Why? Because he has another ideology, another agenda!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive