Well, America must suffer under another Janet, as if Janet Reno wasn’t enough! It would appear that the left of the sane line such as socialists, fascists, and liberals in general, are targeting anything to the right of the sane line. One needs to remember just who and what these people represent.   Fascists were in vogue during the early part of the twentieth century. Two despot leaders that rose during this era with socialistic and fascist agendas were Hitler and Mussolini.  Similarly, Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (Nazi) Party adapted fascism to Germany beginning in 1933, said:

“The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property.” (Barkai 1990, pp. 26–27) Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill.” (p. 280) So, where is America now headed? The socialists and fascists are now in power and the two shall become as one for the good of their cause and party. However, there are some inconvenient stumbling blocks that these left of the sane line must overcome. One is to gain control and remotion of all guns either by complete eradication and seizure or, have them locked up for use on specific occasions like hunting or target shooting, can we say  England’s gun control methods here?  By creating a quasi need for gun control (euphemism for complete seizure) the socialist/fascist party now in power will create the opportunity for this occurrence. Think Hitler here and here is a reminder of how that went down during his reign.

"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler's Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. 

Janet Napolitano’s mindless diatribe concerning “Extremists” is only a portend for what lies ahead. When you verbally indict our military veterans current or past, and then stigmatize them with the extremist’s appellative/appellation, you are labeling them in the same way the Hitler did during his lunatic tenure as leader of Germany. Why is Napolitano concerned over the military aspect and labeling them as extremists? No rocket science needed here to answer that one. She is acting on behalf of the scared and threatened party she now is goose stepping to/for. Their problem (socialists/fascists) is getting into power and then keeping that power no matter what. They are afraid that their regime will be toppled and who better than trained military personnel to accomplish something like that? Hitler worried about being overthrown as aforementioned in his own words. 

It appears that Napolitano is putting into effect the agenda of the less than sane liberal left. What distraction will she create to impose their absolute control agendas? Will she find another Waco to burn to the ground? Will she invade the homes of private citizens and seize their guns? What about militia groups that she perceives as a threat, how will she justify her aggressive “extremist” delusions about them really wanting to take over America so we just had to stop them? Or…will she actually have the government agencies blow up another Murrah Building after she orders some “extremist” stronghold burnt to the ground just like the other Janet (Reno) did at Waco, Texas? It appears that the name Janet has a common mental denominator here. And for America and its’ people that is not good! Personally, they should get Janet Napolitano out of this office before she sets America on fire, not only with words but with Gestapo orchestrated manifestations.   Maybe she will even have the audacity to attack Chuck Norris and label him as an “extremist,” want to wish well on that one Janet!