Posted by
Gary A McAvin on Friday, March 16, 2007 6:41:24 AM
First a definition of hypocrisy so we all know just what it is! Hypocrisy that is!
WEBSTER'S NEW UNIVERSAL UNABRIDGED DICTIONARY
Hypocrite:
1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements
Now notice the terms; pretends, feigns, these are terms descriptive of make believe or fantasy thinking. Is there a fine line between Hollywood actors and Democrats? Or; has that line become so obscured you no longer can tell the difference? Then we see this in the description; whose actions belie… Now those people’s actions are contradicting what they are really saying and doing; sound familiar? Ever study body language? Very revealing!
The latest example of this is the DA’s scandal (quasi) or so it seems. What scandal? The Democratic hypocritical scandal; that’s the one! Now he have hillbilly (HR Clinton) calling for the heads of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Political Architect Karl Rove-Reminiscent of another time and place; can we say John the Baptist here? And how soon we forget! Remember when they (Bill & Hill) were in office? Remember how it was accepted protocol to fire ALL of the DA’s in America? Where was any outrage expressed about this? Free ticket to fire at will. These DA’s serve at the will of the President of the United States! And—he can fire every one of them if he so desires! Personally; I would just to show you it can be done!
Here’s the law on U.S. Attorney appointments. The following basic information is from the US Department of Justice's web site.
“United States Attorneys are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, the President of the United States, with advice and consent of the United States Senate.
United States Attorneys conduct most of the trial work in which the United States is a party. The United States Attorneys have three statutory responsibilities under Title 28, Section 547 of the United States Code:
• the prosecution of criminal cases brought by the Federal government;
• the prosecution and defense of civil cases in which the United States is a party; and
• the collection of debts owed the Federal government which are administratively uncollectible.
Each United States Attorney exercises wide discretion in the use of his/her resources to further the priorities of the local jurisdictions and needs of their communities. United States Attorneys have been delegated full authority and control in the areas of personnel management, financial management, and procurement.”
Now what is unclear about this? Personally; I would fire all 93 U.S. Attorneys just to show certain people I could-if I were the President! We the people should not have to put up with this nonsense! What was said when this happened? Remember when Webb Hubbell a former partner of Mrs. Clinton at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock who later went to jail for mail fraud and tax evasion (he was also Bill and Hillary Clinton's choice as Associate Attorney General in the Justice Department) under Janet Reno his nominal superior; simultaneously fired all 93 U.S. Attorneys in March 1993?
So; now the President wanted to clear some dead wood and what happened? Why these U.S. Attorney dismissals was as though he slapped the Pope up side of his head with all of this hypocritical media and quasi political frenzy! What a bunch of HYPOCRITES!